Key Challenges Organizations Face When Complying With the EU AI Act
The EU AI Act introduces comprehensive regulations for artificial intelligence systems, creating significant compliance hurdles for organizations worldwide. Based on the Act's requirements and early implementation experiences, here are the most pressing challenges companies will face.
1. Identifying Which Systems Are in Scope
The first major challenge is determining which of your AI systems fall under the regulation. Organizations must classify every AI system into one of four categories: prohibited AI, high-risk AI, limited-risk systems (with transparency obligations), or General-Purpose AI (GPAI).
This classification process is more complex than it appears. The Act's definitions are intentionally broad and continue to evolve through regulatory guidance. Many tools used internally—such as employee screening systems, chatbots, or automated decision-making tools—may qualify as "AI systems" under the regulation. Further complicating matters, a single system may fall into multiple categories depending on how it's deployed and used.
2. Meeting Complex Requirements for High-Risk AI
High-risk AI systems face the most stringent obligations under the Act. Organizations must implement comprehensive risk management systems, ensure training data is high-quality and unbiased, maintain detailed technical documentation, establish logging and traceability mechanisms, provide human oversight, implement cybersecurity measures, and conduct ongoing post-market monitoring.
These requirements are resource-intensive and demand entirely new processes, specialized teams, and sophisticated tools.
3. Managing the Heavy Documentation Burden
The Act requires organizations to maintain extensive documentation throughout the AI system lifecycle. This includes design documentation, testing results, model performance reports, data governance evidence, instructions for use, and detailed logging of incidents and system behavior.
Most companies don't currently maintain documentation at this level of detail. Many AI teams have prioritized rapid development over comprehensive record-keeping, making this one of the most significant pain points.
4. Building AI Governance Infrastructure
The majority of organizations lack the foundational governance structures needed for compliance. Few companies have established AI governance teams, clearly defined roles distinguishing providers from deployers and importers, formal audit and compliance workflows, or adopted technical standards like ISO 42001, model cards, or standardized data sheets.
Building this infrastructure requires creating new leadership structures, developing AI risk training programs, and coordinating across multiple departments.
5. Satisfying Training Data Requirements
The Act mandates that training, validation, and test data must be relevant to the system's purpose, representative of real-world scenarios, free from errors, and free from bias. These requirements create multiple challenges for organizations.
Legacy data is often incomplete, poorly documented, or contains historical biases. Data provenance—understanding where data came from and how it was collected—is frequently unclear in existing datasets. Proving that data is truly representative of the populations affected by the AI system is technically difficult. Additionally, data requirements may conflict with privacy laws in other jurisdictions, creating compliance tensions for global organizations.
6. Implementing Post-Market Monitoring Systems
Similar to product safety regulations in other industries, the Act requires continuous monitoring of AI systems after deployment. Organizations must detect model drift in real-time, capture and report serious incidents within strict timelines, create effective feedback loops between monitoring systems and development teams, and oversee third-party or vendor-provided AI systems integrated into their operations.
For many organizations, this represents an entirely new operational capability that requires significant investment in monitoring infrastructure and incident response processes.
7. Managing Vendor and Supply Chain Risk
The Act's reach extends beyond internally developed systems to purchased AI solutions. Organizations must ensure vendors meet EU AI Act obligations, obtain complete documentation and risk assessments from suppliers, audit both deployers and providers in their supply chain, and manage risk when suppliers are unwilling or unable to share model internals for proprietary reasons.
Supply chain transparency will likely become a major bottleneck, particularly for organizations relying on commercial AI solutions where vendors may be reluctant to disclose detailed technical information.
8. Navigating Conformity Assessments
High-risk systems typically require internal conformity checks, and in some cases, assessment by third-party Notified Bodies. Several factors make this challenging: few Notified Bodies currently exist with AI expertise, harmonized standards are still maturing, assessments can be slow and expensive, and global companies may need different assessments for different markets.
Organizations should anticipate potential delays and costs associated with conformity assessments, particularly in the early years of implementation.
9. Resolving Conflicts With Other Regulations
The EU AI Act doesn't exist in isolation. Organizations must navigate overlapping and sometimes conflicting requirements from GDPR, the EU Digital Services Act, cybersecurity regulations like NIS2, and sector-specific rules governing health, finance, and transportation.
For example, GDPR's data minimization principle can conflict with the AI Act's requirement for representative training data. Resolving these tensions requires careful legal analysis and may necessitate trade-offs that vary by use case.
10. Operating With Unclear Guidance and Evolving Standards
Significant aspects of the Act depend on future codes of practice, guidelines from the EU AI Office, and harmonized standards still under development. This means organizations may need to begin compliance efforts without complete clarity on specific requirements—creating risk that early implementation choices may need revision as guidance evolves.
Forward-thinking organizations are monitoring draft standards and participating in industry working groups to stay ahead of these developments.
11. Absorbing the Cost and Resource Burden
Full compliance requires substantial investment in new personnel (including risk managers, auditors, and ML safety experts), documentation and compliance management systems, monitoring and testing tools, legal and regulatory specialists, and organization-wide training programs.
Small and mid-sized companies face disproportionate challenges, as compliance costs don't scale linearly with organization size. These companies may lack the resources to build comprehensive compliance programs, potentially limiting their ability to deploy AI systems in the EU market.
12. Achieving Cultural Change in AI Development
Traditional AI development emphasizes speed and iteration—rapid prototyping, continuous deployment, and learning from real-world usage. The EU AI Act requires a fundamentally different approach: comprehensive documentation before deployment, extensive testing and validation, safety controls and human oversight, and slower, more controlled release cycles.
This represents a major mindset shift for teams accustomed to agile development practices. Organizations will need to balance innovation velocity with the deliberate, safety-focused approach the regulation demands.
Establishing a Path Forward
Successfully navigating these challenges requires organizations to start early, invest in governance infrastructure, engage with emerging standards and guidance, and foster collaboration between technical, legal, and business teams. While the compliance burden is significant, organizations that approach it systematically can build AI governance capabilities that not only meet regulatory requirements but also strengthen trust with users and stakeholders.
For more advanced coursework in data privacy and Artificial Intelligence [AI], read more about Privaci Learning’s data privacy and Artificial Intelligence (AI) online courses including: